Pablo Selaya: “Quantophrenia and anecdotal evidence: A discussion on the mix of methods in applied economics research”

I discuss the problem of defining intuitive concepts such as wealth, happiness and inequality, and outline the approach of researchers in economics to measuring them. I argue that the increasing complexity of the phenomena that applied economists want to understand, and the interest in drawing policy implications from the analysis, require quantitative researchers taking a confident bite of qualitative research methods. I illustrate the reasons with recent examples from research in behavioral economics, political science, and comparative economic and political development, where the incorporation of ethnography, open-ended interviews, and observational-participation increases the informational content of the gathered data, reduces the margins of error in the quantitative analysis part, and facilitates the emergence of new relevant questions.


Skriv en kommentar

Din e-mail-adresse vil ikke blive offentliggjort. Krævede felter er markeret med *


Disse HTML koder og attributter er tilladte: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>